Laser-assisted fat-extraction techniques such as SmartLipo are scientifically unproven and misleadingly marketed, says the inventor of the liposuction method that is the gold standard for fat-removal surgery. Addressing a cosmetic-medicine conference Oct. 11 at Harvard Medical School, ;Dr. Jeffrey A. Klein (below) of San Juan Capistrano challenged the makers of laser liposuction devices to submit to randomized clinical trials. Klein is a cosmetic surgeon, dermatologist, and dermatologic surgeon.
Under his proposal, patients would volunteer to undergo both laser-assisted liposuction and the standard surgical procedure, called tumescent liposuction. One technique would be used on the patient’s left side, the other technique on the right.
In each case, the patient and a surgeon would evaluate the results without knowing which side was which.
Klein called laser liposuction “The Emperor’s New Laser,”implying that it lacks merit, although it is widely praised. That praise includes, for example, an 80 percent approval rating for Smart Lipo from patients visiting the cosmetic-medicine site RealSelf.com.
Laser companies’ direct-to-consumer marketing materials state that laser lipo is better than “traditional liposuction,” which is only true if that refers to a “dry liposuction” technique that hasn’t been used since the early 1990s, Klein said.
Laser companies’ direct-to-consumer marketing materials state that laser lipo is better than “traditional liposuction,” which is only true if that refers to a “dry liposuction” technique that hasn’t been used since the early 1990s, Klein said.
In that older technique, physicians sucked fat out of the body through a tube that they inserted through an incision.
In Klein’s tumescent-lipo procedure, which superceded dry lipo in the early 1990s, physicians inject liquid containing local anesthetic into the surgical site before sucking out the fat.
In laser lipo, a laser melts fat before it is sucked out of the body or, in a variation, is left to be removed gradually by the body’s natural processes. Klein also said manufacturers inaccurately claim that laser lipo helps tighten patients’ skin.
That’s based on a misreading of a 2006 study that found new collagen in skin cells from laser-lipo patients, he said.
Klein, who is an associate clinical professor in UCI’s Department of Dermatology, did not decry laser-assisted liposuction as a hazardous technique, but he said he was suspicious because no information about complications has been published, even though he has heard of some.
This post is based on Klein’s presentation at the “What’s the Truth?” cosmetic-medicine conference Oct. 10-12 at Harvard Medical School. I would welcome comments by e-mail from patients, physicians and laser makers as I prepare for a more in-depth column on the subject.
